Definitive name is 'hbmk'. hbmk2 is temporary, I hope. See the TODO/TOFIXes in hbmk.prg for some possibilities, and my notes in the ChangeLog.
Brgds, Viktor On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Massimo Belgrano <mbelgr...@deltain.it>wrote: > Ok i agree no problem > In your opinion Is hbmk2 a definitive name? > do you Plan other functionality for 1.1? > > 2009/2/18 Viktor Szakáts <harbour...@syenar.hu>: > >> Sorry i want try to help but is still difficult but when we have one > >> tool for build and one for make all be more simplest. > > > > How would you build the Harbour build tool withour Harbour? > > These are two different topics, please let's no mix them together. > > It'd be much more important to clean both processes to have > > _one common method each_. (GNU-make and hbmk respectively). > > > >> > >> Can i suggest for hbmk2 the conditional compilation that non compile > >> module already compiled comparing creation date (i think) > > > > hbmk cleans the objects it created, so it'd need a serious > > change in functionality compared to current state. I don't > > plan to deal with this right now. > > If you need such functionality, you'll have to use hbcmp, hblnk, > > plus the help of an incremental build tool, like GNU-make, nmake, > > etc. > > Implementing this in Harbour seems like an unnecessary double > > work. > > Brgds, > > Viktor > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Harbour mailing list > > Harbour@harbour-project.org > > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour >
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
