Ok i agree no problem In your opinion Is hbmk2 a definitive name? do you Plan other functionality for 1.1?
2009/2/18 Viktor Szakáts <harbour...@syenar.hu>: >> Sorry i want try to help but is still difficult but when we have one >> tool for build and one for make all be more simplest. > > How would you build the Harbour build tool withour Harbour? > These are two different topics, please let's no mix them together. > It'd be much more important to clean both processes to have > _one common method each_. (GNU-make and hbmk respectively). > >> >> Can i suggest for hbmk2 the conditional compilation that non compile >> module already compiled comparing creation date (i think) > > hbmk cleans the objects it created, so it'd need a serious > change in functionality compared to current state. I don't > plan to deal with this right now. > If you need such functionality, you'll have to use hbcmp, hblnk, > plus the help of an incremental build tool, like GNU-make, nmake, > etc. > Implementing this in Harbour seems like an unnecessary double > work. > Brgds, > Viktor > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > > _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
