> > I plan to write in Italian then i try request a translation > somebody have suggestion about which tool use > I think write in open office 3 and search a good layout for manual
We have the trac wiki on sf.net. I've posted the link a few times. > Which feature are planed for hbmk in 1.1? I don't know yet. Maybe lib support, resource support. > I have still one suggestion > Having a simple interactive mode > launching hbmk without parameter see a list of prg,hbp,c,rc > select with space one or more and press button compile > Simple and easy but will be a bridge between people command line > driven and gui driven Nope sorry, I've meant this is a pure command line tool. In fact all our supplied tools are command line only, and this shouldn't be an exception. If you want CUI/GUI, a wrapper program is the best solution. This could simply create a hbmk command line after presenting all the options on the screen for the user and either launch it or save it as .hbm (similar to hbmake). Can be independently developed from hbmk, and if it's good and portable (which now means CUI), we can also include it as part of the Harbour package. > hbmk -? for actual help that can be read also with f1 from interactive mode > can be used a memoedit to read actual help with scrolling row? hbmk | more (on Linux/Darwin you can even scroll up/down) > harbour with this little feature will be more interactive > hbp extension will be associated to hbmk.exe by setup? It can be done, and if someone does this, fine. Notice we don't have a setup for Harbour yet. > hbp will be ready to support user defined extension ignoring parameter > external to his group? Adding user defined extensions is too heavy for this tool IMO, since it would need a whole generic, configurable solution to setup the command and option rules. This would go right against portability and simplicity. Brgds, Viktor
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
