Hi Massimo,
> Harbour will have the defnition of a project > With hbp web have in harbour an file with structure of project > > Will hbmk adopt as format of file xhbp of xmate? Nope, but hbmk could probably be extended to read these files and try to use as much as possible from them. I'm personally largely uninterested in spending time to create code to process these file formats (which I don't know). Many/most features are already supported by hbmk, and the format is simple enough, that it takes just a few minutes for a human to do it manually. If someone wants to contribute here, probably the best would be to write small converter tools from Xbase++ and xMate config files to .hbm. These tools can then be integrated into hbmk, quite easily. Since I've never used above products, it's difficult to tell what they offer (beyond the file format). What still could be done in hbmk, is dependency tracking and incremental build features. I'm currently not interested in these, nor do I have time to implement it, first let's see how this new tool works, let's make it on par with hbmk.sh, let's fill the gaps, then reconsider. Overall however, hbmk does want to stay a simple/light tool, not a Visual IDE replacement nor a do-it-all / solve-it-all utility. Its main purpose is to hide platform differences for users and to allow to make .prg -> executable a one step process on all platforms. So, if you read my ChangeLog entries, you'd find, that the relevant parts/features are already supported of your quoted config files. Resource file handling is still on the TODO list, but since Harbour core doesn't have any resources this isn't topmost priority, I'll add it later as time allows. Brgds, Viktor
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
