On Sat, 04 Oct 2008, Francesco Saverio Giudice wrote: Hi Francesco,
Many thanks for your results. Looks that there in no important difference between DL-MM and BCC-MM in real MT programs in your system. DL has a little bit better performance. In my test in Linux DL-MM in MT mode was killing the performance in MT+ test in comparison to default SUSE malloc when in ST mode it gives nearly the same results. The difference is such huge that Harbour overhead is unimportant at all and it's even hard to measure. So I would like to also test the performance without memory allocation in Windows. I've just added --exclude option to which allows to disable all tests which allocates memory in test loop. If possible please also make this tests again using current SVN speedtst with option --exclude=mem, f.e.: speetst.exe --exclude=mem It doesn't matter which memory manager you will use. You can use the default one. Once again many thanks for your help. best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
