Szakáts Viktor wrote:
What to do?
If we agree on 1). We have to delete thunk/harbour-RC1, make a real
tag in tags/harbour-1.0.0RC1 from thunk/harbour revision 8597, add a
new tag in tags/harbour-1.0.0RC2 from thunk/harbour HEAD revision
after we agree we are releasing RC2.
Fully agreed.
One more question I have is, does these RC1, RC2 have any sense if we
do not do any binary (and even source) release available for final
users? Everyone is using thunk/harbour HEAD.
No much, but this needs someone(s) to do it. Actually if we have a real
1.0 branch and a real 1.0.0RC1 tag (a "read-only" branch), this can be
done anytime but at least independently from the tagging. You're absolutely
right, that releasing an RC1 without getting ppl to actually test it,
has not much point, since the point would be to get feedback on a
basically finished product.
I've tried what I could.
Hi,
ok, so nothing bad happened. We can proceed in this direction - let's
continue developing in thunk until 1.0.0 final and do a proper tag
setting in svn. If we are unable to build binary releases, we'll be able
at least to document simple checkout command after tagging, for those
who want to test some specific RCn.
I'm not sure is Phil has the same opinion about svn layout. He has wrote
"no", but I've not understood his proposition.
Phil Barnett wrote:
>> Do you agree with such a branch layout and versioning?:
> No.
Best regards,
Mindaugas
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
