Hello, Cayetano Santos <[email protected]> skribis:
> I did a quick count of replies (please, correct me if I’m wrong): > > - 45 support (codeberg + email) > - 5 accept (email) > - 1 disapprove (email) [...] > In a personal concluding note, I find that the large consensus reached > in favour of this GCD, even when the departing positions where > radically orthogonal, is a sign of maturity within the community. > Great thanks to all participants, good job: reading your opinions > during last months have been really enlightening for me. Also, the > time it took to converge towards the final draft is a clear indication on > the > importance of this document on the governance of Guix, most people > will agree on the need for keeping clear guidelines to avoid the > existing ambiguity on the current status quo. Huge thanks to > Ludovic for all of his efforts and the time he put towards the final > consensus we have reached. I agree with every word you wrote. The amount of work that many of us put into this document, accounting for one another’s opinions even though we initially started from very different positions, is amazing. There were many insightful contributions throughout the discussion and much participation during deliberation, which in itself is already an achievement. I have yet to better understand what it would take for the proposal to pass, but here we are: with an informal but strong consensus among many of us in favor of regulating of LLM usage in the project. Let’s build on that and move forward. This is also a reminder that the GCD process is very ambitious—building something together is much harder than showing up for a majority vote on someone else’s proposal or than bowing before a BDFL—and it’s also vulnerable. I believe we can improve on that while preserving our collective determination. Thanks everyone! Ludo’.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
