Andreas Enge <[email protected]> writes: > With such a fundamental opposition to the process itself, it is clear > we will not be able to pass any but the most uncontroversial decisions. > The argument "the process could use some more time" is such a blanket one > that it could be used for each and every GCD. I do not know whether this > was your goal from the start; but I feel like you have effectively > collapsed the only decision structure we have as a project.
i'm not aiming this at gabber, they just happen to have shone a light at the problem. is it reasonable to be a guix member if you disagree with the gcd process itself? what happens when a member doesn't consent to, or removes their consent from, the gcd process? -bjc
