Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prik...@gmail.com> writes: >> I think this is just a matter of image, and I'm not sure about who >> are we trying to please with the change. > Since I was the one to initially make this suggestion: myself, plus > whoever agrees with me, regardless of their reason.
... > As a gesture towards inclusion, the change is probably symbolic at > best, but not even doing that for dubious reasons will leave us in the > past indefinitely. I am not arguing on whether the branch name should be changed or not. However, I do think this is a topic that should be discussed in a GCD. I do not have an opinion on whether it's better to do it as part of the Codeberg GCD or separately. That's a decision that's perhaps best left to Liliana and Ludo (and others, in case there were co-authors I've accidentally omitted). However, not discussing this via a GCD would go against its intended use: #+begin_quote The GCD process is intended to provide a consistent and structured way to propose, discuss, and decide on major changes affecting the project. It aims to draw the attention of community members on important decisions, technical or not, and to give them a chance to weigh in. #+end_quote Given that it would affect users' workflow, I believe this change would qualify as a major change. And the importance of a decision made on this topic is made no less important from the benefits being symbolic. Symbols can be important as well. -- Suhail
