Hi Simon, Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> skribis:
> First, since we bounded the various periods, could you be clear about > them? Because, you already found two “sponsors” and the GCD has not > been sent to info-guix, if I read correctly. Like I wrote, I’m anticipating on the GCD process being accepted at all. If it’s accepted on Feb. 5th, then I’ll follow it to the letter. This means we could enter “Discussion Period” on Feb. 5th or so and thus deliberation would end between March 19th and April 19th. > I would add two roadblocks (at least for me): > > 1. Not being able to process offline. > > 2. Not being able to comment patches directly from the editor of my own > choice. I think this was now answered: Magit-Forge, fj.el, forgejo-cli. Not all of this is fully ready, but I’m sure we’ll find enough motivation to give a hand to their developers. [...] > All in all, I do not have yet a definitive opinion on the GCD and I > think we need to include (at least) a paragraph about this “dilemma“ / > trade-off / balance. WDYT? I alluded to it in the ‘Motivation’ section, explaining that we started from tools with a simple design and ended up with a lot of incidental complexity. But yes, we could add something about it under ‘Choice of a Forge’. > 1: https://codeberg.org/martianh/fj.el/pulls/79 Neat! Way to go! Ludo’.
