Hi, Zain Jabbar <zaijab2...@gmail.com> skribis:
> Thank you for showcasing Andrew Tropin's rde project. I believe the > =features= abstraction have potential and make more intuitive sense > for the design of configurable programs. There is a lot for me to > learn from this design choice. > > As it stands, =features= are not in Guix proper, are there plans to > merge them? How will they end up relating to the existing home > services feature set? I don’t think merging “features” into Guix has been discussed before. It does sound like a logical next step to declarative configuration, but I don’t have any experience to really say. Anyway, I think the first step for Emacs configuration with Home is a ‘home-emacs-service-type’, possibly based on/inspired by the one in rde that Andrew mentions. Thanks, Ludo’.
