Hi simon,
> Here below a collection of answers. The teams are more or less. Maybe, > we could join some for having another structure. WDYT? Thank you for the initiative! I had been meaning to go through the whole thread and collect and organize all submissions, but you’ve done all the work already. Thanks! Now the question is merely how to represent and present this. It’s not a bad idea to have the team associations in the repository so that we can present the data on the website and also use it with our tools to notify the right people. It wouldn’t help with keeping mailing aliases on fencepost up to date, though. I also wonder about how / if we should notify teams about relevant patches. Will contributors Cc the relevant teams or will we have team predicates, e.g. a procedure that spits out the appropriate teams when given a patch? -- Ricardo
