Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 09:40:04AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> I knew this couldn't be right, but I thought I remembered it having
>> fewer dependencies. Oh well. Sorry for the noise.
>
> It's relatively new that ImageMagick is depended on by so many packages.
> I think we should look into this and see if we can significantly reduce
> the number.
The following dependency chain seems to be responsible for most of the
imagemagick-dependent packages:
gtk+@3 -> at-spi2-atk -> at-spi2-core -> gtk-doc -> dblatex -> imagemagick
Mark
