Hi Mark, On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 08:51, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> wrote:
> This is really nasty. Why is imagemagick grafted, anyway? I think it > can simply be updated without causing many rebuilds, no? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix refresh -l imagemagick@6.9.11-48 | cut -f1 -d':' Building the following 1269 packages would ensure 2404 dependent packages are rebuilt $ guix refresh -l imagemagick@6.9.12-2g | cut -f1 -d':' Building the following 2 packages would ensure 2 dependent packages are rebuilt $ guix refresh -l imagemagick | cut -f1 -d':' Building the following 2 packages would ensure 2 dependent packages are rebuilt --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I am not in the graft dancing but I suspect something wrong here. I have never checked but intuitively, I thought that graft has the priority so “guix refresh -l imagemagick” should display all the dependents. Note it is the same story as zstd. Cheers, simon
