Earlier, I wrote: > Why is imagemagick grafted, anyway? I think it can simply be updated > without causing many rebuilds, no?
Actually, I see now that it would cause many more rebuilds than is appropriate for master. mhw@jojen ~$ guix refresh -l imagemagick Building the following 1270 packages would ensure 2403 dependent packages are rebuilt: [...] Strangely, before I ungrafted imagemagick on my own private branch, I asked guix the same question and got a very different answer: mhw@jojen ~$ guix refresh -l imagemagick Building the following 2 packages would ensure 2 dependent packages are rebuilt: cl-ltk@0.992 ecl-ltk@0.992 I knew this couldn't be right, but I thought I remembered it having fewer dependencies. Oh well. Sorry for the noise. Mark