Hi Recardo, Hi Ludo, > >> • Merge the potluck! <https://bugs.gnu.org/26645>
> About that… We now have a JSON importer, so maybe it’s worth using the > even simpler JSON package format instead of the simplified S-expression > format that Andy proposed. What do you think? Should we discuss this > at <https://bugs.gnu.org/26645>? FWIW, I much prefer s-exp, and the generated file is a scheme file right? I very much doubt guix and potluck package developers can't easily read (and write :)) s-exp, so why would we 'abandon' s-exp, what would we win here? These files will never be processed by anything else but guix and/or potluck, and the 'package developers' do all know scheme perfectly well... my 2c :) Thanks for the fantastic work, both Guix and potluck! David
pgpqDRdyBWzW5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
