Mark H Weaver (2017-06-04 20:15 -0400) wrote: >> +(define-public s >> + (let ((commit "6604341edb3a775ff94415762af3ee9bd86bfb3c") >> + (revision "1")) >> + (package >> + (name "s") >> + (version (string-append "0.0.0-" revision "." (string-take commit 7))) > > I think we should rename this package and variable name to 's-shell' or > something along those lines. 's' is commonly used as a local variable > name. Single character variable names are in short supply, and I don't > think we should allocate them to packages. > > Thoughts?
And what about "r" package? In my opinion, package names for "r" and "s" should stay the same – I think these names are expected by users. As for the variable names, they may be renamed, if it is needed. -- Alex
