k...@openmailbox.org (Kei Kebreau) writes:
> kkebreau pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> commit 0e4591bb696a36bc83f75869dd2711987b17b722
> Author: ng0 <n...@no-reply.pragmatique.xyz>
> Date: Tue May 16 22:28:58 2017 +0000
>
> gnu: Add s.
>
> * gnu/packages/shells.scm (s): New variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kei Kebreau <k...@openmailbox.org>
> ---
> gnu/packages/shells.scm | 61
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/shells.scm b/gnu/packages/shells.scm
> index 5eeb186..5e04e86 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/shells.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/shells.scm
> @@ -503,6 +503,67 @@ Its features include:
> @end enumerate\n")
> (license bsd-2)))
>
> +(define-public s
> + (let ((commit "6604341edb3a775ff94415762af3ee9bd86bfb3c")
> + (revision "1"))
> + (package
> + (name "s")
> + (version (string-append "0.0.0-" revision "." (string-take commit 7)))
I think we should rename this package and variable name to 's-shell' or
something along those lines. 's' is commonly used as a local variable
name. Single character variable names are in short supply, and I don't
think we should allocate them to packages.
Thoughts?
Mark
