ng0 <contact....@cryptolab.net> writes: > John Darrington transcribed 2.0K bytes: > >> I am glad that at least one person can express a point of view and be >> polite about >> it at the same time. If you think it is fine, then it is your right to use >> it. >> >> I find it confusing and clunky in most cases, and I refuse to use it. I >> also >> reserve the right, when others advocate its use, to present my own point of >> view. >> >> If anyone chooses to interpret that as rude, sexist, intolerant or >> whatever - then >> that is their problem and not mine. They will have to get over it. > > Okay, so you are just one of those ignorant assholes who drive people > away from projects because they think their are the middle of the > universe and other problems don't exist because they have never > experienced them and oh deity forbid if someone insults their holy > grammarbooks and linguists. Cool. Glad that we have solved that. > > That's actually the first time that I'm not polite. But I can't be > polite to ignorant people. I just won't work with you anymore and ignore > you, as you choose to ignore other people with your behavior and > invalidate their existence and bother them with your view of what's > "correct" and what's not.
This reaction is highly intolerant and not acceptable in this community. Disagreeing doesn't justify being rude or insulting people. -- Mathieu Lirzin GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
