Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes:

> Marius Bakke <mba...@fastmail.com> skribis:
>
>> * gnu/packages/databases.scm (rocksdb): New variable.
>
> [...]
>
>> +           (lambda* (#:key (make-flags '()) #:allow-other-keys)
>> +             ;; Prevent the build from adding machine-specific 
>> optimizations.
>> +             ;; This does not work if passed as a make flag...
>> +             (setenv "PORTABLE" "1")
>> +             (and (zero? (apply system* "make" "static_lib" make-flags))
>> +                  (zero? (apply system* "make" "shared_lib" make-flags)))))
>
> We could avoid building the static libs if nothing requires it; no
> strong opinion though.

I do tend to simply drop the static libs (see e.g. "dlib" or
"capnproto"), but in this case Ceph requires the static library. I will
make another attempt at making it use "-lrocksdb" instead of the ".a"
before pushing this package however, now that I know the build better.

In the crypto++ case, static is the default make target, so I suspect
it's "normal" to use. But as I recently realized, grafting most likely
won't work with static libraries, so I will remove it. Being a crypto
library and all. We should discourage it indeed.

>> +    (home-page "http://rocksdb.org/";)
>> +    (synopsis "Persistent key-value store for fast storage")
>> +    (description
>> +     "RocksDB is an embeddable, persistent key-value storage library that is
>> +designed for flash and RAM storage.")
>
> Could you expound a little bit?

How about:

(synopsis "Persistent key-value store for flash and RAM storage")
(description
  "RocksDB is a library that forms the core building block for a fast
  key-value server, especially suited for storing data on flash drives.
  It has a Log-Structured-Merge-Database (LSM) design with flexible
  tradeoffs between Write-Amplification-Factor (WAF),
  Read-Amplification-Factor (RAF) and Space-Amplification-Factor (SAF).
  It has multi-threaded compactions, making it specially suitable for
  storing multiple terabytes of data in a single database.
  It is based on @code{LevelDB}.")

(taken from the README)

Thanks a lot for the reviews!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to