Christopher Allan Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Mike Gran <spk...@yahoo.com> skribis: >> >>>>On Sunday, January 8, 2017 2:48 AM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>>>I think it would take more than elisp compilation support to port Emacs >>>>packages to Zile-on-Guile. Essentially we’d need many APIs that Emacs >>>>provides. >>> >>> I looked at the current beta of paredit, and I quickly scanned >>> the code to look for *emacs* primitives. Below please find a list >>> of the primitives that Zile is missing. Note that this isn't the >>> missing *elisp* procedures. >>> Adding the majority of these is quite straightforward, but, >>> some have heretofore been out of scope for Zile. The missing >>> categories of concepts are >>> - lisp and scheme filling and indentation >>> - blinking the cursor or a matching parenthesis >>> - handling comments >>> - handling what emacs calls "lists" which is moving up and down >>> balanced parentheses >>> Here's the list. I probably missed a few. >> >> Woow, thanks for investigating! >> >> Looks non-trivial. I wonder how much of it could be trimmed by focusing >> just on the subset of Paredit relating to matching parens. >> >> Ludo’. > > I mentioned this earlier in the thread, but I think it got lost... > mit-scheme's edwin includes a scheme-based paredit. I haven't tried > looking at how much work it would be to port to Zile, but I'm guessing > since it's also scheme, it wouldn't be much work. > > I've extracted it from the latest mit-scheme release and included it. > The code is in the public domain. > > Maybe it can be of use?
Yes, probably! It seems smaller than the “real” Paredit, which is already a good thing. (I won’t be working on it in the near future but I’m bookmarking this thread…) Ludo’.
