l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Mike Gran <spk...@yahoo.com> skribis: > >> The functions expressed in Scheme in Zile-on-Guile are the same >> as upstream Zile had. It is a fairly limited set. >> Zile-on-Guile is a Scheme, not an elisp, even though the functions >> it expresses have elisp-like names. So there is little portability >> between Emacs and this Zile. > > Yes. Any idea how hard it would be to port the real Paredit to > Zile-on-Guile?
Isn't there native support for elisp in Guile? Would this allow running directly Paredit (elisp), provided that Zile-on-Guile implements everything that Paredit needs from the Emacs API? This is probably more work in the short term than rewriting Paredit in Scheme, but it would enable Zile-on-Guile to potentially run (m)any Emacs packages. Maxim
