Hello, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Mike Gran <spk...@yahoo.com> skribis: >> >>> The functions expressed in Scheme in Zile-on-Guile are the same >>> as upstream Zile had. It is a fairly limited set. >>> Zile-on-Guile is a Scheme, not an elisp, even though the functions >>> it expresses have elisp-like names. So there is little portability >>> between Emacs and this Zile. >> >> Yes. Any idea how hard it would be to port the real Paredit to >> Zile-on-Guile? > > Isn't there native support for elisp in Guile? Would this allow running > directly Paredit (elisp), provided that Zile-on-Guile implements > everything that Paredit needs from the Emacs API? > > This is probably more work in the short term than rewriting Paredit in > Scheme, but it would enable Zile-on-Guile to potentially run (m)any Emacs > packages. I think it would take more than elisp compilation support to port Emacs packages to Zile-on-Guile. Essentially we’d need many APIs that Emacs provides. Ludo’.
