Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Roel Janssen <r...@gnu.org> writes: > >> So, the only proper way to do it, is to manually add a test phase in >> each package definition. But then we still have to add a lot of >> dependencies that are only needed to run the tests, and even then the >> tests don't say much.. In the case of this package, the test functions >> can't run because they use functions that aren't loaded yet, which >> results in failures of the tests (while the package works just fine). >> >> Could I therefore, please, go ahead and push the patch without the >> additional inputs for running tests? > > Yes, please do! I was just curious. Sorry for delaying this! > > ~~ Ricardo
Pushed in 36e5d1038 and ed8bc028f. Thanks!
