Roel Janssen <r...@gnu.org> writes: > So, the only proper way to do it, is to manually add a test phase in > each package definition. But then we still have to add a lot of > dependencies that are only needed to run the tests, and even then the > tests don't say much.. In the case of this package, the test functions > can't run because they use functions that aren't loaded yet, which > results in failures of the tests (while the package works just fine). > > Could I therefore, please, go ahead and push the patch without the > additional inputs for running tests?
Yes, please do! I was just curious. Sorry for delaying this! ~~ Ricardo
