John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:19:00AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > I begin to suspect that what I want has not been written, like in > several other cases I ran into in the last years.
What I meant here, and before that, will get too offtopic at the moment. Eventually I will have an article translated which I can reference in a text. (For those fluent in those two languages, this is what I mean: http://my.pages.de/convivenza.it , http://my.pages.de/convivenza.de ) In this case "has not been written": I'm thinking about a completely distributed version control system, serverless, but there are issues I do not understand at the moment and can not put my full attention to. I have some ideas outlined, and some annoyances every system I used so far had (namechanges for examples). This is also why I am packaging darcs to look at pijul and so on. > I suspect it is more a case of not being able to agree on one. > > I have found, in the past, that aegis is a great tool for managing the kind of > work we do. Amongst other things, code review and tests are built into the > design - and not tagged on as an afterthought. And it is designed to ensure > an "always works" policy. A real "continuous integration" tool, which is a > term which is banded about so much these days, but rarely actually done. > > > Unfortunately, aegis is difficult to introduce to a project - not for > technical > reasons - but social ones. My attempts have often resulted in people > complaining > that the thing is "defective" because it won't allow them to do what they > want (ie commit > without review/build/test). > > J' This sounds interesting. Is there a demo instance somewhere? > -- > Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encryted email. > PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 > fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 > See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key. > -- ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
