Hartmut Goebel <h.goe...@goebel-consult.de> writes:
> Am 15.08.2016 um 17:18 schrieb Alex Vong:
>
> Of course, there are other alternatives, such as gogs,
>
> The gogs.io website is using a lot of external content, namely from
> google and jquery. The FAQ is hosted a another external side, discus.
> Gogs is not even self-hosting gogs but hosted at github. gogs.io does
> not even state which license it has ("Open Source It all at guithub"),
>
I am a bit confused here, are we going to (1) host the code on our own
server, or (2) using code-hosting service provided by other
organization?
If we are doing (1), then it is up to us to meet the GNU ethical
repository criteria [0]. If we are doing (2), then we need to ensure
that our service provider meet the criteria [0].
What I suggested is doing (1) with gogs. Do I understand the situation
correctly? WDYT?
> So there would be at least some work to be done to fulfil the "B"
> criteria "Does not report visitors to other organizations"
>
> (I have to admit that I did not check this for gitlab, though.)
[0]: https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria.en.html
