Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > I suppose it wouldn’t handle patch series very well though, would it? > Or people would have to send the “cover letter” of the series first, and > then send the rest to n...@debbugs.gnu.org once a number has been > assigned?
Or could we have a bug per module? Then the whole patch series could be sent to the bug id of the module. But I guess this would make it harder to keep track of individual package submissions again, because bug would rarely ever be closed when there are lots of patches to the same module. > What’s unclear to me is how convenient Debbugs is for non-Emacs users: > Emacs has M-x debbugs-gnu, which is a significant UI improvement, but > how do non-Emacs users deal with Debbugs? Outside of Emacs I only ever used Debbugs in read-only fashion. The web interface is not very pretty but it’s functional and looks better than the default mailman interface. ~~ Ricardo
