Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:23:18AM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: >> This isn't the best name for a piece of software I suggest, but it is >> reasonably well known in the field. >> >> 'murmur-hash' takes the code from a repository SMHasher, but I'm not >> interested in packaging that. That is OK? > > I looked at the Debian package [0]. It uses the bundled copy or > murmur-hash. Since there doesn't really seem to be an independent > upstream distribution of murmur, I think it's fine to do the same. > > What do others think?
I agree. Just leave a comment explaining the situation so we can revisit it later if the need arises. Thanks, Ludo’.
