On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:23:18AM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > This isn't the best name for a piece of software I suggest, but it is > reasonably well known in the field. > > 'murmur-hash' takes the code from a repository SMHasher, but I'm not > interested in packaging that. That is OK?
I looked at the Debian package [0]. It uses the bundled copy or murmur-hash. Since there doesn't really seem to be an independent upstream distribution of murmur, I think it's fine to do the same. What do others think? [0] https://packages.debian.org/sid/khmer
