Hey Leo, thanks for the thoughts.
On 17/06/16 18:16, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:23:18AM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
'murmur-hash' takes the code from a repository SMHasher, but I'm not
interested in packaging that. That is OK?
I'll try packaging SMHasher. Hopefully it's not too hard.
Go right ahead if you like. However, I wouldn't really recommend it
because the only function of it is to test the quality of different hash
algorithms, which probably isn't useful as anything except as an end in
itself, and in that case a user might want to manage the compilation
flags themselves anyway. But I won't stand in your way, of course.
What if we change the name of the package to 'smhasher' and leave
packaging the binary for later if someone is really interested?
Thanks
ben
