l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> skribis: > >> The concern of backward compability that Ludo raised, have made the work >> more challenging than changing things in place. As a consequence it was >> not clear to me what should/can change or not. To keep my mind clear, I >> have decided to leave the emacs part unchanged. So the true reason is >> exhaustion. :) > > Sorry that this had this effect!
not Breaking "userspace" is a valid concern that deserves care. so please don't be sorry. -- Mathieu Lirzin
