Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis: > Sorry if it was discussed but why 'package-full-name' from (guix > packages) wasn't changed?
I think I was afraid that existing uses in unexpected place would break, such as when using the full name as anchor names in HTML. But then I also remember a version of ‘package-full-name’ that took an optional separator that defaulted to ‘@’. I forgot the details! :-) I don’t think it’s crucial though. WDYT? > Also I have a question regarding hydra. Will hydra jobs still have > such names as "git-2.6.3" or will they also be changed to "git@2.6.3"? I would leave them unchanged. > From 2dbfe087905cc08715bba0f4d4dd0093fd93372b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:53:03 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] emacs: Use '@' to separate package names and version > numbers. > > This is a followup to commit 1b846da8c372bee78851439fd9e72b2499115e5a. > > * emacs/guix-base.el (guix-package-name-specification): Use "@" instead > of "-". > * emacs/guix-main.scm (name+version->full-name): Likewise. > (package-inputs-names): Use 'make-package-specification' instead of > 'package-full-name'. > (full-name->name+version): Update the docstring. > * emacs/guix-ui-package.el (guix-packages-by-name): Likewise. Looks good. I forgot about these places where the “full name” matters, sorry about that. > From c6825b189f7b5d908c5fbe36d933fbe187cbc4bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:55:21 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: hydra: Use '-' to separate job names and version > numbers. > > * emacs/guix-hydra.el (guix-hydra-job-name-specification): New procedure. > * emacs/guix-ui-package.el (guix-package-info-insert-systems) > (guix-package-list-latest-builds): Use it. OK! Thanks for catching it! Ludo’.
