Hi, Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes:
> Mathieu Lirzin (2016-02-29 03:28 +0300) wrote: > > [...] >> I have left the emacs interface untouched. > > Hm, I wonder why? You already had the required changes in your initial > patch. Anyway, I'm attaching the patch with these changes. The only > difference from your original patch is replacing 'package-full-name' > with 'make-package-specification' in "guix-main.scm". The concern of backward compability that Ludo raised, have made the work more challenging than changing things in place. As a consequence it was not clear to me what should/can change or not. To keep my mind clear, I have decided to leave the emacs part unchanged. So the true reason is exhaustion. :) -- Mathieu Lirzin
