On 2015-06-29 03:39, l...@gnu.org wrote:
Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:05:35AM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote:
I would prefer to keep "deal.II" for the name at least, because that
it
the software's declared name, despite the domain and tarball being
"dealii". Are there arguments against it?
The package naming conventions. We always transform to lowercase, and
replace
special characters by "-". So both "dealii" (as the tarball name) and
"deal-ii" (transformation of the project name) would be fine.
+1
Ludo’.
Thanks for the clarification. I ended up pushing with the "dealii"
name.
--
`~Eric
