On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:05:35AM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote: > I would prefer to keep "deal.II" for the name at least, because that it > the software's declared name, despite the domain and tarball being > "dealii". Are there arguments against it?
The package naming conventions. We always transform to lowercase, and replace special characters by "-". So both "dealii" (as the tarball name) and "deal-ii" (transformation of the project name) would be fine. Andreas
