Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis: > On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:05:35AM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote: >> I would prefer to keep "deal.II" for the name at least, because that it >> the software's declared name, despite the domain and tarball being >> "dealii". Are there arguments against it? > > The package naming conventions. We always transform to lowercase, and replace > special characters by "-". So both "dealii" (as the tarball name) and > "deal-ii" (transformation of the project name) would be fine.
+1 Ludo’.
