Hi! Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sounds reasonable. below is a work-in-progress sketch > that dreamers (-: or insomniacs who want to dream) might > find interesting. the manifesto is still bubbling, but > only time will tell... I'm not sure I fully understand what `check-r6rs-library' does (and I don't have `(ice-9 accumulate)' also...). At any rate, one thing that is sure is that unfortunately, we don't have phase separation in Guile (unless Guile 1.4 significantly diverged from 1.[68] in that respect). Since this is one of the foundations of R6RS libraries, we'd have a hard time implementing them. My guess is that we'd better rewrite the interpreter altogether (in Scheme or a subset thereof) to have one more "manageable", amenable to deep changes like this... Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
