Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> currently:
> (define-module (foo)
> #:use-module (a b c)
> #:use-module ((d e f) #:select (x y z))
> #:export (bar))
>
> proposed:
> (define-module (foo)
> #:use-modules
> (a b c)
> ((d e f) #:select (x y z))
> #:export (bar))
>
> that is, `#:use-modules X Y Z' would be exactly equivalent
> to `#:use-module X #:use-module Y #:use-module Z'.
I would prefer something with the syntax
#:use-modules ((a b c)
((d e f) #:select (x y z)))
Which eliminates the indentation issues and brings it more in line
with the syntax of Common Lisp's defpackage :use clause. Insert
generic comment about consistent syntax here.
--
"Karen loved animals. Unfortunately the cheetahs betrayed her trust,"
Libot said.
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
