() Keith Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> () Fri, 5 Oct 2007 19:47:50 -0400
It would be heartening to read that the maintainer of the fork wants to build toward the other branch were it not for the cynical suspicion that that "harmonize" is like "bi-pertisan"; it means everyone should do it my way, even if they fundamentally disagree with me. for me, it means everyone interested should say what they would (or would not) do and then if there is concensus (after some refinement), i follow. if there is no concensus, i muddle through the best i can (as always). from the sound of the responses thus far, this is the most likely outcome. If you want to harmonize, maybe both branches could think about implementing R6RS library forms. the library body is specified to be included in the `library' form. OTOH, `define-module' is a peer top-level form to the library body. how would you reconcile these approaches? thi _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
