Hi, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is in CVS now. Thanks Neil! BTW, what do you think of `*current-reader*' instead of `current-reader' as a fluid name? It would be more conventional and consistent with the rest of Guile (e.g., `current-module' names a procedure, not the fluid itself). > Yes, sounds good. The configurable 'load' reader may help us towards > that goal, by allowing people to experiment easily with what kinds of > reader configurability are useful, and what kind of API is convenient > to control it. Precisely, `guile-reader' is meant to be an equivalent of CL's read table. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
