Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I still don't like the module option (no surprise there), and I think > that the other parts of the patch could be made a bit simpler (which > to my mind is a Good Thing). To be completely concrete about what I > mean, here is a version of your patch which I prefer (untested except > by make check). Please let me know what you think.
It seems equally acceptable to me. Originally, I decided to not expose the `current-reader' fluid in order to be consistent with other "stealthy" uses of fluids, like `current-module' (the fluid itself is not exported, only a setter and a getter are). But this has the drawback of requiring the `dynamic-wind' hair in `basic-load'. And it also looks more mysterious or magic to user, which is not a good thing. So either way will be fine to me. Thanks! Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
