On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 02:09:31PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > >> The danger is that fs_probe may reject filesystem as valid just because > >> it's newer than expected. > >> > > > > What do you mean with "reject filesystem as valid"? > > > > > Sorry for being unclear. I just meant that if some XFS structures are > updated then our xfs driver won't recognise it as xfs
What do you mean with "updated"? You mean a new implementation of XFS? Or the same instance of XFS that has been modified after use? -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
