On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 01:43:37PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > Robert Millan wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:18:05AM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko > > wrote: > > > >> 2009-10-16 Vladimir Serbinenko <phco...@gmail.com> > >> > >> + * util/i386/pc/grub-setup.c (setup): Refuse to overwrite XFS superblock. > >> + (options): New option --destroy-xfs. > >> + (main): Handle --destroy-xfs. > >> > > > > I gave this some more thought, and I think this could be less ad-hoc. We're > > treating XFS as if it were a "weird", unique thing just because it isn't > > biased > > towards DOS-style boot like most filesystems are. > > > > Instead, I've done something more generic, using our standard filesystem > > probing engine which should be more reliable than a single memcmp. > > > > > The danger is that fs_probe may reject filesystem as valid just because > it's newer than expected.
What do you mean with "reject filesystem as valid"? -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
