On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:30:51PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 09:56:50AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 12:11:48PM -0800, walt wrote: > > > > What is the problem initially? > > > > > > kernel_img-kern_device.o: In function `grub_device_iterate': > > > ../kern/device.c:84: undefined reference to `__enable_execute_stack' > > > > > > That's defined in libgcc so I add -lgcc to the link flags: > > > > > > /usr/lib/libgcc.a(_enable_execute_stack.o): In function > > > `__enable_execute_stack': > > > _enable_execute_stack.c:(.text+0x40): undefined reference to `__sysctl' > > > _enable_execute_stack.c:(.text+0x6f): undefined reference to `mprotect' > > > > > > Both of those symbols are defined in libc.a, so I included that, too. > > > Any ideas? > > > > Do you see this line in ./configure ? > > > > checking whether `gcc' accepts `-fstack-protector'... yes > > Yes. > > Apparently -fno-stack-protector doesn't actually work the way > I/we would expect. > > But, I'm surprised that this doesn't affect the building > of NetBSD's own 'stand' code.
Maybe we need another flag? Could you check the link command in NetBSD's kernel ? -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
