Vladimir Serbinenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marco Gerards wrote: > >>Vladimir Serbinenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>So the problem with approach #1 is doing double work, less obvious >>integration with the rest of the parser and memory leakage. >> >> > Of course in real code it would be freed. It was just schemathical
Right, but the other disadvantages remain. So I really want approach #2 to be used unless it has a clear disadvantage. -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
