Marco Gerards wrote:
Vladimir Serbinenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So the problem with approach #1 is doing double work, less obvious
integration with the rest of the parser and memory leakage.
Of course in real code it would be freed. It was just schemathical
Right. The only reason I see for editing the script in general is to
edit some menu generation routine. But that is a very rare case I
think. If it turns out not to be a rare case, we can provide this
feature later on.
Even if it's not generating is used to create many menus or to create
menus from templates and anyway you boot only 1 menu entry and only
interesting thing is generated code, not the template or generating method.
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
