On Sunday 30 October 2005 10:45 am, Marco Gerards wrote: > Right, I felt it hard to explain the direction I'd like to take on > this list. So I have implemented the core functionality because that > definitely has to be right.
I don't know what direction you would like yet. It is hard to figure out all of your ideas from the implementation. I only know that it is differently implemented. > > - What are disadvantages in Vladimir's implementation? > > In my opinion it is not clean enough and does not integrate with GRUB > like I would like it to. And Vladimir's patch was way too hard to > maintain when I started working on this a week ago. Can you elaborate on those points? I still don't understand. > > - What are disadvantages in Marco's implementation? > > > > Fewer features are implemented. The kernel is bloated. > > What do you mean with the kernel is bloated? My patch moves a lot of > responsibility to commands. I would say it is less bloated. I mentioned this, because your parser is built into the kernel. This is unnecessary, as the rescue mode does not need fancy features. Okuji _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
