Hi Carsten, Carsten Kunze writes: > "Anthony J. Bentley" <anth...@cathet.us> wrote: > > > I agree that `` '' makes no sense in modern ASCII; even in an xterm they > > look unbalanced. " " would probably be a saner ASCII result for Dq, > > \(lq, \*(Lq, and so forth, but I don't know how complicated a change > > that would be or if there would be any larger implications to making > > such a change. I believe the patch in my previous email is the correct > > behavior for the non-ASCII case though. > > It is generally no problem to differentiate between nroff and troff output. > I suggest to do this here and to apply the patch for typeset output.
By ASCII I meant specifically ASCII output. I use UTF-8 terminals and the patch was intended to improve how the nroff output looks in that case. -- Anthony J. Bentley
