> Either way, my intend was not to discuss where to find more help
> (summa summarum the original paper PLUS the Roff EQN man PLUS the
> Groff EQN man should cover almost everything (I hope - do they
> not?)). It was my suggestion to not leave it up to the user to
> assemble a complete documentation on EQN from all arround the
> internet but to ship a complete documentation with Groff itsself, as
> it is the case with everything else BUT eqn.
I fully agree. However, I lack the time (and honestly, the energy
currently) to do it. Any volunteers are highly welcomed!
Werner
